« The New Fed Policy: Better Than Nothing | Main | Incentive Systems Can Be Counterproductive »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cd0c953ef0134862cc29a970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bank Examiners Are Stifling Commercial Credit:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
During a time when everyone currently involved in lending is trying to avoid having a finger pointed at them as the reason for a defaulting loan (or series of loans), I could understand why an examiner would be putting pressure on banks. However, I'm unfamiliar with how accountability for systemically bad loans is structured between the banks and their examiners. Clearly the banks lose if their client is in default, but if the problem is widespread, are examiners held accountable? Is there any information you could provide on this?
Posted by: Spencer | August 14, 2010 at 12:40 PM